Skip to content
Sochi hotels with pools: why we removed these collections
Editorial Position
Updated:8 min1,668 words

Sochi hotels with pools: why we removed these collections

The five roundups that used to live at this address are gone. They were lists of hotels with pools, including heated seawater pools, resort complexes, and all-inclusive options. We deleted them entirely and are not listing any names or prices.

This topic shows most clearly that the decision is not just an editorial political gesture. When the European Union introduced the ban, it stated its purpose directly, and we break that down below. A hotel with a pool and all-inclusive dining is the definition of non-essential leisure.

💡 At a glance:

  • which five roundups were deleted and why they could not be rewritten
  • how the stated purpose of the ban is worded and what it means for a publisher
  • why this is a rule, not our editorial choice
  • which southern seaside destinations remain in the live sections of the site
  • Last updated: 09/2026

Why we deleted these guides

Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine began on February 24, 2022. The resort lists written before that date kept sitting on the site and performing their only function: nudging readers toward booking. They had no informational value outside that function, so the question was not about editing but about deletion.

All old addresses in all language versions now have a permanent redirect to this page, so that a reader arriving from search gets an explanation rather than an empty page.

We deliberately do not list any properties or their features, even though that would look harmless in an explanatory text. A named resort complex, even mentioned in the past tense, works as a recommendation: the reader remembers the name, not the context. That is why we only talk about the types of deleted roundups, and that is enough to understand what they covered.

The financial side is worded as follows. The share of oil and gas revenue in Russia's budget fell to roughly 22 percent in 2025 and 2026, while the share of non-oil-and-gas revenue rose to roughly 78 percent (OSW Centre for Eastern Studies, 12/09/2025). A resort complex with a pool and a restaurant pays taxes into exactly that part of the budget, which is why the argument rests on the revenue structure rather than on oil.

The purpose of the ban is stated directly

Sanctions are usually described in broad terms, but here that is not necessary: the purpose is stated openly. The stated goal of the ban is to reduce the revenue Russia earns from tourism-related services and to curb the promotion of non-essential travel and leisure in the country (Skadden, analysis of the 19th sanctions package, 11/2025).

The wording about leisure is not accidental here. It separates necessary travel from non-essential travel: a business trip, a family visit, or humanitarian work is not equated with a vacation at a resort complex. Our deleted roundups fell entirely into the second category, without a single exception, and this is one of those rare cases where the regulation describes a specific genre of text almost verbatim.

Two things follow from this wording. First, the EU legislator explicitly recognized tourism as a source of state revenue, not a neutral activity. Second, "promotion" is named separately from the service itself, and promotion is exactly what a hotel roundup does: it tells you how nice it is there and invites you to choose.

The rule itself looks like this: Council Regulation (EU) 2025/2033 of October 23, 2025 replaced paragraph 2 of Article 5n of Regulation 833/2014 with a direct ban on providing services directly related to tourism activities in Russia (EUR-Lex). The ban also covers online platforms and apps that enable booking, ticket sales, and visa assistance when all of this is connected to tourism (Fieldfisher).

This is a rule, not an editorial gesture

The transition period applied only to contracts concluded before October 24, 2025, and ended on January 1, 2026; after that date there are no exceptions (Skadden, 11/2025). This matters because a reader is entitled to ask whether we are passing off our own beliefs as a legal requirement.

The answer is this: the legal part applies to any person in the European Union regardless of what our editorial team thinks. The editorial part concerns only the fact that we did not look for ways to stay within what is formally permitted and did not publish "neutral" versions of the same lists. These are different layers, and we do not mix them.

It is also worth clarifying how the transition period worked, because there is a lot of confusion around it. It concerned contracts, not travelers: the rule did not apply to the performance of agreements concluded before October 24, 2025, and of ancillary contracts necessary for their performance (EUR-Lex, Regulation 2025/2033). In other words, it was about letting businesses close out what they had already started, not about phasing in the restriction. As of January 1, 2026, that carve-out is exhausted.

The practical side adds another argument, one that depends on neither law nor conviction. Visa and Mastercard announced the suspension of operations in Russia on March 5-6, 2022. Operations stopped on March 10, 2022, and cards issued outside the country do not work there (The Moscow Times, 03/06/2022). Organized tourism to the country fell by roughly 90 percent back in 2022 (industry statistics overview, Fox News, 2022).

What this means for you as an EU reader

Item

Status 09/2026

Source

Stated purpose of the ban

Reduce Russia's revenue from such services and curb the promotion of non-essential travel and leisure

Skadden, 11.2025

Legal basis

Article 5n(2) of Regulation 833/2014 as amended by Regulation 2025/2033 of 23.10.2025

EUR-Lex

Transition period

Ended 01.01.2026, no exceptions

Skadden, 11.2025

Online booking and visa assistance

Covered by the ban when related to tourism

Fieldfisher

Paying with an EU card

Impossible since 10.03.2022

The Moscow Times

German Foreign Office advisory

"Vor Reisen in die Russische Föderation wird gewarnt"

Auswärtiges Amt

Where to go instead

The query was about a pool, full board, and a predictable vacation. The live sections of the site answer that: Turkey, Cyprus, Greece, Bulgaria, and, for a short trip from Germany, Italy and Spain. Heated pools and a long season are available on all these coasts, and both cards and insurance work there.

The editorial team's overall explanation for the entire section is collected in the section hub. Related topics: our position on beach hotels and our position on family hotels.

Where we stand

We believe that publishing resort lists about a country waging war against a neighboring state is not informing readers, but participating in promoting vacations there. In our assessment, the wording of the ban's purpose describes our previous work more accurately than we would like: we were indeed promoting non-essential leisure. That is why we decided to delete these materials and explain the reason at the same address.

We write about a state and its policies, not about people based on their passport. There are people in Russia who spoke out against the war and received prison sentences for it. Our decision not to publish Russia travel guides is about money, sanctions, and reader safety, not nationality.

Publication date: September 3, 2026. Last updated: September 3, 2026.

⁉️🤔 Frequently asked questions

Does the ban really apply to a regular editorial article?

We do not provide legal opinions. We proceed on the basis that the list of covered services includes advertising services related to tourism, and that the stated purpose of the ban separately names the promotion of travel and leisure. A hotel roundup performs exactly that function, so we are not publishing it.

Why couldn't you just leave the lists without booking links?

Because that does not remove the advertising function. A text that compares resort complexes and advises choosing one of them remains promotion regardless of whether a link is present.

Isn't this a punishment for private hotel owners?

We make no demands of private businesses and call on no one to boycott. We decide only for our own publications. The rule in question is addressed to persons from the European Union, not to Russian companies.

Where do the old addresses of these roundups lead?

To this page in all language versions, so that the reader gets an explanation and a list of destinations instead of an error page.

You have three texts about hotels in one city. Why so many?

Because these three groups of pages were reached by different queries and different internal links, and the redirect should land on topic rather than in a general pile. Each of the three texts explains the decision from its own angle: this one through the stated purpose of the ban, the neighboring ones through the money framework and through safety.

In short

Five roundups of Sochi hotels with pools and full board have been removed. The stated purpose of the EU ban directly names the promotion of non-essential leisure. The rule is Article 5n(2) of Regulation 833/2014 as amended by Regulation 2025/2033; the transition period ended on January 1, 2026. Paying for accommodation with an EU card has been impossible since March 2022. The southern seaside destinations we continue to cover are listed above.

How you can help

We do not collect money and receive nothing from the links below. These are official websites of organizations working with the consequences of the war:

Sources

Link check date: 03.09.2026.

tourism.com.de Editorial Team
tourism.com.de Editorial TeamTravel editorial team: research, fact-checking, updates→ All publications

A small editorial team writing guides for independent travel. We travel ourselves, but we haven’t been everywhere, so we check prices, opening hours and how to get there against official sources.